Come on now Stewart.  If you take the time to analyze the spectrum of a pulsed 
radar signal, you will find that all of the energy is contained in a location 
surrounding the carrier frequency.   Also, how well do you think a dish radar 
antenna being feed by a bandwidth limited waveguide is going to radiate those 
200 to 1000 Hz signals?   If you can show me where any significant amount of 
that low frequency is radiated I will assume that you are knowledgeable in RF 
design.

It is easy to convince people that know nothing about radio and radar systems 
to be concerned about unimportant issues.  And, as everyone knows, statistics 
can prove just about anything that you wish to prove based upon the 
restrictions that are placed upon the data that is analyzed.

The same type of reasoning is used to keep kids from being vaccinated or 
cellular antenna locations from being located in the ideal places.  We need 
real science instead of  variable statistics to settle these issues properly.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: ChemE Stewart <[email protected]>
To: vortex-l <[email protected]>
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 1:53 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying...


Dave, the pulse train is a square wave, with the "on" amplitude approx 900' 
long or longer depending upon duty cycle, bouncing between clouds/planes and 
the suface of the ocean  
  
 
 
Just one weather radar has an EIRP of 32 billion watts of power, which gets 
ducted and scattered by planes and the atmosphere, more during storms. 
 
  
 
 
Mildly shocking biology with every pulse, depending upon impedence 
 
  
 
 
Electricity can kill you in a nanosecond, each radar pulse is 1000 times longer 
that that in duration. 
 
  
 
 
Admit it, you sparkies   screwed up :) 
 
  
 
 
Stewart 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
  
   
  
  
   
   
On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, David Roberson <   [email protected]> wrote:   
   
    The radar pulse rate does not effect the penetration into the water.  In 
other words, the 200 to 1000 Hz rate is applied to the carrier and does not 
independently appear anywhere else.
 
 Dave
      
       
      
      
       
      
      
-----Original Message-----      
 From: ChemE Stewart <      [email protected]>      
 To: vortex-l <      [email protected]>      
 Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 8:12 am      
 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying...      
       
       
        VLF radio waves (3–30 kHz) can penetrate seawater to a depth of 
approximately 20 meters. Hence a submarine at shallow depth can use these 
frequencies.         
         
         
        
         Most of the radars pulse at 200-1000 Hz.        
        
         
         
        
         Most of the coral disease is in shallow water <20 meters
          
 On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, ChemE Stewart <         [email protected]> wrote:   
      
         
 Except low pulsed frequencies                    
          
 On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, James Bowery <          [email protected]> wrote:   
       
          
           
            
            
             
             
 On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:42 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint              
<[email protected]> wrote:              
              
               
                
                 
This is primarily meant for fellow Vort, ChemEng (Stewart), but some others may 
have an interest…                                                  
                 
                                                   
                 
Stewart, I think I may have a cause for your hypothesis re: a link between our 
modern radar systems and the dying of coral reefs…                
                
               
              
              
               
                
                 
...                                  
                 
Time to break out the tin-foil hats???                
                
               
              
              
             
             
            
            
 No need.  Salt water shields against EM penetration.            
           
          
         
        
       
      
    
  
 
 

Reply via email to