Thanks for the video presentation Jed and Tom. It was very enlightening. I think Claytor demonstrates with out a doubt that there is a nuclear interaction enhancement that occurs in hydrated/deuterated solid state that are active. Active in that D is actively moving in and out of the metal. So, a high voltage AC (or shaped current) could have an effect.
I'm still curious. What is the tritium concentration in the Jovian atmosphere and is it a a level you would not expect? On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Jed Rothwell > > > > Ø In this field, researchers often appropriate other people's work as > proof of their own claims. Mills does that a lot. The people he cites often > disagree. In some cases they have no idea he is citing them. I am not > saying that is unethical. It is perfectly okay; just as it is okay to cite > the work of a researcher who died long ago. > > > > And conversely, sometimes an experimenter does not want to acknowledge > other work partially confirming his own results but in a way that his IP > does not anticipate. To wit: Randell Mills almost certainly has been seeing > tritium in the water arc discharge of the Sun Cell. Given Claytor’s > results, how could he not see T under such similar circumstances?? > > My memory is hazy on this, and it is seldom mentioned, but back in the > early 1990s Randell Mills actually reported finding tritium in an article > he wrote for Fusion Technology Magazine, and then went quiet on the subject > (probably following the advice of his patent attorney). The point being > this: 25 years ago, Mills knew that tritium would be produced from the > nickel hydrogen reaction when electric arcs are present, but he has avoided > it like the plague since then – since his patent applications and theory > have value only if they aren’t nuclear. > > But the weirdest thing of all is that tritium should be seen ONLY in > deuterium reactions… yet it is seen with pure hydrogen, even for Claytor. > And the larger irony is that this result probably confirms that even the > cold fusion version of this reaction is based on fractional deuterium > (since neutrons are not witnessed)… and all done in a way that would > potentially void Mills’ IP, since what we have is the real fusion of a > fractional species… > > > > … which is to say that the correct theory was never “either-or” but “both > together”. > > > > Jones >
