Axil-- So baryon mass is converted to a small SPP which grows as more and more mass is lost. The growth is from existing electrons from the lattice I assume. So the mass energy is translated into spin energy and the associated angular momentum of the SPP and the SPP’s intense magnetic field with its potential energy. Finally the SPP gets unstable and collapses, giving up its spin energy and magnetic field’s potemtial energy to create soft x-rays and other photons which are then absorbed by the lattice in resonant EM excitation of the lattice components as heat.
Does this correspond to your explanation of the energy conversion? Note it includes the energy of the SPP associated with its angular momentum. Spin energy and angular momentum are not normally considered “EMF” you have suggested is stored in the SPP. If the intense magnetic field is spinning and carries angular momentum, then it must decay in multiples of a quanta of angular momentum in its production of photons. This process may be relatively slow, since a resonant receptor may not be available in the coherent system accomplishing the suggested energy transfers. The random phonic resonances associated with a hot (black body resonator) lattice material may be key to controlling such a reaction. Dynamics and control software used by fission reactor designers may be very useful in designing a reactor which is controlled by the resonant vibrations of a coherent nano lattice within a macroscopic solid that conducts heat at classic rates. Feedback loops in such a system would be complicated with maybe several significant parameters affecting the reaction. (Coherent system shape and size, magnetic field strength, temperature of nano structure and potentially a different temperature for the macroscopic structure, etc., etc., are some .) Bob Cook From: Axil Axil Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:25 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: LENR-forum: Claytor generates increased tritium with Brillouin technique The SPP solitons absorbe the energy and soliton's freqency increases from infrared until it gets into the extreme ultraviolet and weak x-ray range. Then the dark sloiton becomes a bright one and all the stored EMF is refleased as photons when the photons and electrons in the soliton decouple. This is where the black light comes from seen in many LENR experiments. This is the same process of energy ftransformation that occurs in Sonoluminescence when sound energy is converted to XUV light. On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 1:10 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: The question how the mass loss associated with a fusion reaction is distributed as heat still seems unanswered. Does Claytor have any ideas? Bob Cook t From: Jones Beene Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 6:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:LENR-forum: Claytor generates increased tritium with Brillouin technique From: Jed Rothwell Ø In this field, researchers often appropriate other people's work as proof of their own claims. Mills does that a lot. The people he cites often disagree. In some cases they have no idea he is citing them. I am not saying that is unethical. It is perfectly okay; just as it is okay to cite the work of a researcher who died long ago. And conversely, sometimes an experimenter does not want to acknowledge other work partially confirming his own results but in a way that his IP does not anticipate. To wit: Randell Mills almost certainly has been seeing tritium in the water arc discharge of the Sun Cell. Given Claytor’s results, how could he not see T under such similar circumstances?? My memory is hazy on this, and it is seldom mentioned, but back in the early 1990s Randell Mills actually reported finding tritium in an article he wrote for Fusion Technology Magazine, and then went quiet on the subject (probably following the advice of his patent attorney). The point being this: 25 years ago, Mills knew that tritium would be produced from the nickel hydrogen reaction when electric arcs are present, but he has avoided it like the plague since then – since his patent applications and theory have value only if they aren’t nuclear. But the weirdest thing of all is that tritium should be seen ONLY in deuterium reactions… yet it is seen with pure hydrogen, even for Claytor. And the larger irony is that this result probably confirms that even the cold fusion version of this reaction is based on fractional deuterium (since neutrons are not witnessed)… and all done in a way that would potentially void Mills’ IP, since what we have is the real fusion of a fractional species… … which is to say that the correct theory was never “either-or” but “both together”. Jones
