Hi, On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:32 PM, AlanG <[email protected]> wrote:
Using a coating would require recalibration and testing, and would make > comparison with prior test data open to question. > I'm sure you've thought through this. Commenting only on the tactical merits and not on the technical ones, judging from previous discussion over the last few years I think it would be a mistake to omit the refractory paint. It would perhaps be too much effort to do two sets of trial runs, one without the paint and another with it? That would allow the comparison to historical data as well as allay any concerns about emissivity, of which we can be guaranteed there will be. Eric
