Axil, the math is fine but IMHO we need to consider equivalent acceleration where the region of space the hydrogen is passing thru is a warp and the entire atom undergoes Lorentzian contraction becoming relativistic NOT JUST THE ELECTRON. You and I are not expending energy to move at 9.8m/sec^2 – we exist in a Well and a relativistic perspective of Casimir effect makes the cavity a warp . IMHO geometrical suppression of virtual particles at the nano scale allows for a robust linkage to change in vacuum pressure, unlike the tedious Pythagorean relationship between V^2/C^2 to achieve relativistic effects I am convinced suppression can “slow the rain” of vp thru a cavity just like an umbrella changing the inertial frame equivalently of hydrogen gas atoms passing thru said cavity. How these equivalent relativistic hydrogens of different fractional values interact with each other may be the real mystery. Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 3:20 PM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Piantelli theory of LENR is wrong. The electron(s) associated with the H- cannot enter the nucleus unless their energy is greater that 20 MeV due to the uncertainty principle. [http://image.slidesharecdn.com/quantummechanics-130416113624-phpapp01/95/quantum-mechanics-52-638.jpg?cb=1366112279] An electron in a H- orbital cannot be that energetic since it would shed that energy through the production of an x-ray photon as the H- seeks a state of minimum energy. Such an energetic electron is relativistic and free. Ergo, the H- (Piantelli) theory is wrong. [Thumbnail]<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/58/BertozziExp.svg/600px-BertozziExp.svg.png> Data of the Bertozzi experiment show close agreement with special relativity. Kinetic energy of five electron runs: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 4.5, 15 MeV (or 1, 2, 3, 9, 30 in mc²). Speed: 0.752, 0.828, 0.922, 0.974, 1.0 in c (or 0.867, 0.910, 0.960, 0.987, 1 in c²).
