The warp is caused by suppression geometry of the cavity walls or defects in the lattice, it is a quantum effect of the surrounding geometry that the atoms happen to be randomly migrating through, they may react to the decrease in vacuum density but they did nothing themselves to supply the energy and would likely release any potential energy gained between different density regions because they simply transform to the new value. IMHO it requires an asymmetrical reaction to occur that opposes this free translation of gas atoms such that the normally unexploitable random motion of gas becomes exploitable. My pet theory is that h2 molecular bond may oppose the translation but random motion forces the molecule to translate anyhow and weakens the covalent bond.. if already near the threshold the molecule could disassociate in what may be a real world HUP trap / Maxwellian demon because “random” becomes meaningless when any direction represents a change in density. Regardless of theory applied I think it is the quantum effect of the surrounding geometry that is “powering” the anomaly and therefore not just effecting the electron but rather the entire atom and nearby atoms and molecules all to different extents proportional to their local suppression force/wall proximity. Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 4:58 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Piantelli theory of LENR is wrong. What causes the warp? On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Roarty, Francis X <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Axil, the math is fine but IMHO we need to consider equivalent acceleration where the region of space the hydrogen is passing thru is a warp and the entire atom undergoes Lorentzian contraction becoming relativistic NOT JUST THE ELECTRON. You and I are not expending energy to move at 9.8m/sec^2 – we exist in a Well and a relativistic perspective of Casimir effect makes the cavity a warp . IMHO geometrical suppression of virtual particles at the nano scale allows for a robust linkage to change in vacuum pressure, unlike the tedious Pythagorean relationship between V^2/C^2 to achieve relativistic effects I am convinced suppression can “slow the rain” of vp thru a cavity just like an umbrella changing the inertial frame equivalently of hydrogen gas atoms passing thru said cavity. How these equivalent relativistic hydrogens of different fractional values interact with each other may be the real mystery. Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 3:20 PM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Piantelli theory of LENR is wrong. The electron(s) associated with the H- cannot enter the nucleus unless their energy is greater that 20 MeV due to the uncertainty principle. [http://image.slidesharecdn.com/quantummechanics-130416113624-phpapp01/95/quantum-mechanics-52-638.jpg?cb=1366112279] An electron in a H- orbital cannot be that energetic since it would shed that energy through the production of an x-ray photon as the H- seeks a state of minimum energy. Such an energetic electron is relativistic and free. Ergo, the H- (Piantelli) theory is wrong. [Thumbnail]<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/58/BertozziExp.svg/600px-BertozziExp.svg.png> Data of the Bertozzi experiment show close agreement with special relativity. Kinetic energy of five electron runs: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 4.5, 15 MeV (or 1, 2, 3, 9, 30 in mc²). Speed: 0.752, 0.828, 0.922, 0.974, 1.0 in c (or 0.867, 0.910, 0.960, 0.987, 1 in c²).
