What causes the warp? On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote:
> Axil, the math is fine but IMHO we need to consider equivalent > acceleration where the region of space the hydrogen is passing thru is a > warp and the entire atom undergoes Lorentzian contraction becoming > relativistic NOT JUST THE ELECTRON. You and I are not expending energy to > move at 9.8m/sec^2 – we exist in a Well and a relativistic perspective of > Casimir effect makes the cavity a warp . IMHO geometrical suppression of > virtual particles at the nano scale allows for a robust linkage to change > in vacuum pressure, unlike the tedious Pythagorean relationship between > V^2/C^2 to achieve relativistic effects I am convinced suppression can > “slow the rain” of vp thru a cavity just like an umbrella changing the > inertial frame equivalently of hydrogen gas atoms passing thru said cavity. > How these equivalent relativistic hydrogens of different fractional values > interact with each other may be the real mystery. > > Fran > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, July 30, 2015 3:20 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Piantelli theory of LENR is wrong. > > > > The electron(s) associated with the H- cannot enter the nucleus unless > their energy is greater that 20 MeV due to the uncertainty principle. > > > > An electron in a H- orbital cannot be that energetic since it would shed > that energy through the production of an x-ray photon as the H- seeks a > state of minimum energy. Such an energetic electron is relativistic and > free. Ergo, the H- (Piantelli) theory is wrong. > > [image: Thumbnail] > <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/58/BertozziExp.svg/600px-BertozziExp.svg.png> > > Data of the Bertozzi experiment show close agreement with special > relativity. Kinetic energy of five electron runs: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 4.5, 15 MeV > (or 1, 2, 3, 9, 30 in mc²). Speed: 0.752, 0.828, 0.922, 0.974, 1.0 in c (or > 0.867, 0.910, 0.960, 0.987, 1 in c²). >
