Will someone with an  analogical bent find out if there was more fission
going on than fusion.  It looks like there was an increase in lighter (Z)
elements and a reduction in the heavier elements. Nickel which according to
Rossi is not a fuel looks like the element that was most likely to be
disrupted in favor of lighter elements like oxygen. Are we seeing muon
fission going on?

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> This just in. See:
>> http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Attachment/387-Parkhomov-Soshi-20150930-English-1-pdf/
> These comparisons are interesting.  But it's pretty unsatisfying that all
> tests but the Lugano test were run for a handful of days rather than weeks
> and developed much less excess heat than that purported to the Lugano test.
> There is a shadow hanging over the Lugano test, concerning whether Rossi
> played with the contents of the fuel (or ash).  I would love for this
> shadow to be dispelled, but isotopic analyses from a short test run with
> little excess heat will not do it.  (Another possibility: there's some
> unknown parameter that adjusts what isotopes are consumed and produced.)
> Unfortunately, we watchers of this field must be satisfied with tidbits of
> half-information of the kind that can be derived from the Lugano report,
> and are always left wondering what's going on.
> Eric

Reply via email to