Keep these items(dots to connect) in mind Two different sources for producing H(0) have been used for this study. They are similar to a source described in a previous publication.28 Potassium-doped iron oxide catalyst samples (cylindric pellets)32,33 in the sources produce the ultradense H(0) from hydrogen or deuterium gas flow at pressures of 10−5–100 mbars. The sources give a slowly decaying muon signal for several hours and days after being used for producing H(0). They can be triggered to increase the muon production by laser irradiation inside the chambers or sometimes even by turning on the fluorescent lamps in the laboratory for a short time
Note that energy for muon production is stored for "several hours and days after being used for producing H(0)." They can be triggered to increase the muon production... sometimes even by turning on the fluorescent lamps in the laboratory for a short time On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > The Holmlid effect is common throughout LERN as stated by the AIRBUS guy. > > See how 8 different LENR systems produce the same tell tail indications > on photos, Even Pd/D > > http://restframe.com/rf/home.html > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *From:* Stephen Cooke >> >> >> >> Ø It's a nice process you are describing, but I'm curious how it can >> generate the mesons reported by Holmlid? Is there some mechanism based on >> this idea where mesons are produced or can they only generated by very high >> energy interactions with nucleons and require much higher energies than you >> are describing here? >> >> I am somewhat in Eric’s camp on the mesons, kaons and so on, which could >> be misidentified and/or have other explanations. The important detail in >> Holmlid’s work seems to be the clusters of dense hydrogen, and how to make >> them… That and the elegance of finding a way to make clusters of hydrogen >> on an inexpensive catalyst, with very high chemical binding energy. >> >> The mesons etc. which are claimed to be present could be related to >> cosmic rays – and/or to a hidden feature of dense hydrogen, such as having >> a large capture cross-section for muons, neutrinos or other exotica. Didn’t >> you mention that ? Plus – the sharpness of the laser pulse can cause the >> occasional nuclear reaction in normal deuterium, even if there was no dense >> RM. Certainly the dense clusters would seem to make an ideal target for ICF >> fusion. I am quite happy to leave all of that to the National Labs, in >> favor of focusing on the low end. That would mean gamma free. >> >> All of the high energy results, if accurate, are icing on the cake. The >> “cake” in this metaphor, would be … finally … a valid explanation for the >> “real LENR,” with emphasis on “low energy.” If the thermal gain can be >> understood as chemical, with no gamma and little transmutation – then that >> is the huge benefit of Holmlid’s work. >> >> >> >> >> >> >
