a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: Mats, > I have commented as shown below. > > Global warming has been exaggerated. To understand why see: > > http://people.iarc.uaf.edu/~sakasofu/pdf/two_natural_components_recent_climate_change.pdf > Note Fig 2b. > > There is nothing unusual about the weather. . . . >
Beware of statements like this. You have cited one person who has one opinion. It is contrary to the opinions of a large number of climate experts. It is possible this one person is right and the experts are wrong but it is unlikely. If there is one lesson the history of cold fusion teaches it is that the experts are usually right, and you should not listen to strange people from outside the scientific establishment. People often think that cold fusion teaches just the opposite lesson, but they have it wrong. In cold fusion, the established experts in electrochemistry and calorimetry were able to replicate and they published definitive proof that the effect is real. Most of the people criticizing these results were either scientists in unrelated fields who did not bother to read the literature, blowhards such as Robert Park, or anonymous, ignorant fanatics at Wikipedia who name themselves after comic book characters. In other words, they are outside the establishment. They have no credibility. As Fleischmann often said, "we are painfully conventional people." - Jed
