<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=from:%22CB+Sites%22><http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]&q=date:20151203>CB
Sites wrote: "In regards to the physics of global warming, it's very real."
Of course it's warming. The world has warmed 0.5C/century since the end
of the Little Ice Age, but I doubt that is what you meant.
Your linked paper may well be right based on the assumptions used. The
problem is the assumptions are wrong. Some are missing. None of the
models can hindcaste well beyond the range for which they were tuned
because they don't yet understand things like clouds and cannot
forecast the multidecadal oscillations as these are chaotic.
You can see just how poorly they all work in the following link (there
are many similar), no matter that someone has written a paper proving by
another model that the models are right.
http://b-i.forbesimg.com/peterferrara/files/2013/11/Roy-Spencer-IPCC-Models1-1024x711.jpg
