On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 4:21 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: (I hope you can, because I can't ;). >
If you were to try to explain the mercury, on the assumption that it is not contamination, what would be your guess? Eric
On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 4:21 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: (I hope you can, because I can't ;). >
If you were to try to explain the mercury, on the assumption that it is not contamination, what would be your guess? Eric