Jones, I’ve been stuck in a mode considering anomalous forms of hydrogen as free flowing molecules exposed to surrounding tapestry of metal lattice, but your suggestion of “metalized hydrogen” makes me consider a solid solution. could metallic hydrogen self catalyze such that it doesn’t need the intense pressure other than an “immediate” tapestry surrounding it, ie self catalyzing in Millsian fashion within a parent lattice from which it builds inward ? I still subscribe to the Naudts relativistic proposal but applied now to this solid concept where perhaps the parent lattice maintains the solid foundation and then successive layers of proportionally shrunken metal hydrogen lattice grow /push inward away from the parent lattice “down a well” where each successive layer is exposed to fewer and fewer virtual particles in a negative Lorenztian like manner without the need for near C displacement. My proposal being that metalized hydrogen can load much further down into the interstial space of the parent lattice and grow instead extra dimensionally outward. Reactions at the extreme excursions of these extradimensional wells would achieve large values of spatial displacement and temporal dilation but being a solid would provide mechanical linkage back to our frame. Could relativistic displacement and mechanical linkage together explain some of the strange anomalies with LENR like spectrum shifts, lack of Gamma radiation, modified half lives and even a recent thread about radiation not measured near the reactor wall but measured further away? Fran
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 11:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:North Korea... and the UDD "candle"? From: Teslaalset > There may still be the issue of sufficient lifetime of UDD to be > resolved though. Yes, it could be short. Has anyone seen recent data on average lifetime from Holmlid? We know that metallic hydrogen, as previously described in the literature, is not stable unless kept under extreme pressure. The assumption has been that whatever species corresponds to UDD is not this kind of metallic hydrogen (the previously described variety) … although it could be metallic. Thus the confusion. There could, in fact, be several varieties of condensed hydrogen which are possible, including whatever Mills’ theory suggests. Holmlid’s UDD is far denser than the metallic hydrogen which is made in a diamond anvil press. That would mean that shock compression is fundamentally more efficient than mechanical compression. One detail which would make my day, and yours too - would be an emission line coming from the decay of the Holmlid version of UDD which matches the 3.5 keV emission line which is turning up everywhere these days in cosmology. This would mean that UDD is probably the same species as “dark matter” and it would provide greatly needed secondary validity to Holmlid’s claims.
