Holmlid suggests 0.18 s lifetime possible. See: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/244327849_Formation_of_long-lived_Rydberg_states_of_H_2_at_K_impregnated_surfaces
Question is, when UDD realy exists, does it allow to store in metal lattices (e.g. Nickel) and when so, will this expand it’s lifetime? On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Teslaalset <[email protected]> wrote: > There may still be the issue of sufficient lifetime of UDD to be resolved > though. > > On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 5:54 AM, John Berry <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Jones, I appreciate the recap. >> >> But while I appreciate that there may be breakthroughs and perhaps this >> one goes above the level my post considered... >> >> I was talking about conventional nuclear weapons that are declassified. >> Not black projects, not experimental research. >> >> Now you do make a good point, but I'm not sure we really know what >> Holmlid is doing currently, especially me since this is outside my area >> of active interest really. >> >> I am not sure if can be considered settled sciences well known to create >> a suitcase H-bomb with conventional nuclear yield. >> Are you sure it can be? >> If so that is scary! >> >> John >> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> You still are not on the right page, John. >>> >>> I think this is because you are unaware of Leif Holmlid’s work, and how >>> that work fits into the big picture of World politics. Holmlid is >>> showing complete mass conversion of nucleons into energy, which is a >>> step above nuclear fusion. He has been publishing this in peer reviewed >>> journals for a decade but AFAIK, none of his important experiments are >>> independently replicated, at least not in the USA. >>> >>> I will try to be more specific on the details. Going back to the >>> original premise, if we can believe both Professor Holmlid and North K >>> orea – then what we are facing is precarious situation for World Peace >>> which could be worse than imagined by experts. The points to consider >>> and combine are: >>> >>> 1) Holmlid has presented a technique to make an ultra-dense from >>> of deuterium (UDD) which has a nucleon separation of 2.3 picometers. >>> >>> 2) This material has been shown to be much easier to fuse than >>> normal deuterium. In fact, Holmlid can fuse UDD and even cause complete >>> nucleon disintegration, using only a milliwatt laser for triggering. >>> >>> 3) NK has been involved in LENR since about 2001, according to an >>> earlier press release. They certainly are capable of doing sophisticated >>> research >>> in nuclear physics and can be assumed to have read Holmlid’s papers. >>> >>> 4) NK has this week tested what they call a compact “hydrogen >>> bomb” but the yield is in the range of few kilotons – far less than a >>> fission triggered fusion type of H-bomb and less than a boosted design. >>> >>> 5) This combination of salient facts, if true, leads to only a few >>> conclusions about what is really going on behind the scenes. >>> >>> 6) One conclusion, which may be unlikely but which cannot be >>> ignored, is that NK has managed to make enough of the Holmlid deuterium >>> (UDD), or even UDDT, to weaponized. >>> >>> 7) The great risk of open-research on the internet is that an >>> exotic material such as UDD, which can be easily converted into energy, >>> can be produced and disintegrated without a fission trigger by a Rogue >>> Nation or well-funded terrorist group. >>> >>> 8) For instance, if you do the numbers to extrapolate from Holmlid’s >>> tests to the 5 kiloton explosion which did happen this week – then it >>> is possible that a few grams of UDD could produce that kind of result if >>> fully disintegrated into muons. The ratio for comparative energy of UDD >>> to TNT is about one billion to one. The NK could even have used laser >>> triggering. >>> >>> >>> For a sardonic laugh, imagine 1,000 laser-pointers surrounding a tiny fuel >>> pellet like mini version of NIF. >>> >>> >>> *From:* John Berry >>> >>> Looking it up, Boosted Fission if a Fission-Fusion bomb where the Fusion >>> instead of being the main event is merely a minor improver of Fission >>> efficiency. >>> >>> Fusion Fission (as a bomb) is not possibly according to anything >>> declassified or any known physics within reason. >>> >>> >> >
