Dear Jed, I will answer with an Ego Out editorial (not today) Cold Fusion must become an energy source as all the other, even more reliable- the longer term task is to function without any energy taken from outside- but now the performance is given by the energy balance- the!MW plant has proced COP-times more energy than has consumed. Please have empathy for the customer. And power/energy size matters decisively. In this case it is about 1MW.Less is bad. The immense airplane has nothing to do with this.In technology useless is worse than flawed, we are learning from errors. Peter
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:36 AM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> A satisfied client who sign the receipt is probably Rossi's answer. >> > > That would be a compelling answer! > > > >> The definition will be business, as scientifically there are better >> evidence than a 1MW boiler, since long, and nobody was satisfied. >> > > Yes. I hope that once cold fusion is accepted, people will go back and > look at this older evidence. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
