Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: This is an inference that has been made, using a lot of assumptions, > including an assumption that it's a stable ratio. >
You can see it is stable, in Fig. 6, and in various other studies. > Let's do admit that it's not very close. > Way closer than any other hypothetical product. > If the fission products are things that are commonly thrown excluded from > analysis as being contaminants, such as iron, calcium and titanium, there > may be more than enough to account for the energy balance. > Not according to Mizuno et al., or to various experts I have heard from. - Jed
