What underpins the strong force (the color force) is monopole magnetism in a superconductive context. Certain hard to produce chemical base crystal arrangements can produce this superconductive monopole magnetism. This class of chemicals in a nanoparticle format can disrupt the strong force and the particles that depend on that force.
When atoms are disrupted, they will reform in unpredictable ways. Many times alpha particles are formed that will become helium. Holmlid might be disturbing protons to generate K-mesons. However, there are a half dozen other nuclear mechanisms that are afoot when the strong force is disrupted in the context of Bose condensation. In this case things get hard to predict as was apparent in the production of the pure Ni62 particle in the Lugano test. On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I may not understand what you are calling to as a NUCLEAR FUSION >> REACTOR. I assume you are not saying Rossi’s reactor is a NUCLEAR FUSION >> REACTOR. >> > > Of course it is. What else could it be? Assuming the thing works at all it > is similar to Pd-D cold fusion reactors. These convert deuterium into > helium in the same ratio that plasma fusion reactors do. They produce > millions of times more energy than any chemical reactor could, with no > chemical changes. If that isn't fusion, I do not know what would be. > > What do you think it is? Zero point energy? The Mills effect? I doubt > those things exist and I do not know of any evidence for them. > > > I consider whatever is the source of excess energy in Rossi’s reactor it >> is not similar to the source of energy as envisioned from a NUCLEAR FUSION >> REACTOR. >> > > Every indication from Pd-D is that it is exactly the same except that it > does not produce neutrons for some unknown reason. I do not know what the > reaction products from p-p fusion would be, but whatever they are, if Rossi > looks for them I expect he will find them. > > > >> They are as different as a gasoline motor and an electric motor IMHO. >> > > I would say they are as similar as combustion and metabolism. > > > >> I disagree with your comment that, “In the 21st century, the public and >> the regulators will *never* allow a nuclear reactor to be used.” What I >> call nuclear reactors are used every day in this country and elsewhere in >> the world. >> > > I meant a reactor that is not thoroughly understood, and which has not > been exhaustively tested for safety. I think I made that clear that is what > I mean. I think it would be insane to allow such reactors. Any regulator > who allowed such a thing should be held criminally liable. > > At least 6 cold fusion reactors have exploded for no known reason, some of > them producing far more energy than any chemical reaction could have. > Rossi's reactor threatened to go out of control once, and one time when it > turned on it produced an enormous burst of radioactivity, which was > measured by Celani. It was off the scale. Fortunately, it only lasted for a > millisecond or so. Otherwise it would have killed everyone in the room. > Think for a moment what would happen if one of his large reactors were to > go out of control and explode or irradiate people. A large-scale accident > could easily bring about the permanent demise of cold fusion. Research in > this field might be banned. After Mizuno's accident at Hokkaido University, > the University refused to let him conduct any more experiments. > > > >> Specifically your comment, “The notion that Rossi and a small group of >> people can do this by themselves in isolation is preposterous.” It does >> not seem to apply to Rossi’s work with Industrial Heat. >> > > If it took $1 billion to develop a Prius automobile what makes you think a > handful of people can develop a revolutionary fusion reactor on their own, > and ensure that it is safe? Does Rossi's blog give you the impression that > he completely understands the reaction and that he can guarantee it will > never go out of control or cause harm? He would win a dozen Nobel Prize if > he were capable of understanding cold fusion on that level. > > - Jed > >
