Yes indeed. Experimental data reported by Karabut and his coworkers (from Lutch laboratory in Russia) were spectacular, as summarized in:
http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/10lutch.html and in their later ICCF reports. Their apparatus was quite simple. Unfortunately, I am not aware of independent confirmations of their results in other laboratories. Ludwik =========================== On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: > My take on the curves shown after slide 49 is that they were showing > evolution of the spectrum. As the machine and Ag vapor gets hotter and > hotter, the spectrum will begin to be dominated/overwhelmed by blackbody > radiation. What is heated to those temperatures is Ag vapor. I am not sure > exactly what you mean by "lasts very long at that temperature" (I presume you > mean doesn't melt), but I think the answer is that we are talking about a > vapor (gas) of Ag. Plasmas are commonly at that temperature. > > I said that the 10V source has a capability of generating up to 10eV effects > which correspond to 124nm minimum wavelength photons. In the chart 49 you > can see the spectrum from the photons cut-off before reaching down to 124nm. > This spectrum is from the emissions of the silver+H2O in the arc before being > overwhelmed by the vapor around it that is very hot. A 10eV electron or a > 124nm photon is not enough to ionize the inner shells of Ag, even if it is a > vapor. Another thing to consider is drawing a Stephan-Boltzmann curve over > the UV portion of the radiation below that cuts off just before reaching down > to 124nm. The temperature for such a curve would be about 6000K. Even at > 6000K, you don't produce blackbody photons at 124nm. My point here being > that the soft x-ray spectra are not explained by the temperature (even of > 6000K) or 10eV possible excitations from the 10V. > > OTOH, Karabut has published papers about the generation of laser-like x-ray > photons in systems capable only of lower energy transitions. It could be a > hydrino signature, but that was not Karabut's conclusion, nor that of Peter > Hagelstein who has a theory for what is happening in Karabut's experiments. > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Bob-- > > Look at slides that follow #49—like about 57 and 60 or so. The first is a > multi-colored spectrum of some different runs I believe in Nano meters up to > about 500. And the second is a calculated spectrum for a black body for 5000 > D Kelvin. Note that the multi-colored graph shows each run of the colored > lines turning into a black body spectrum for about 5000 D K. > > If some material stands 5000 D K for any length of time, I would like to know > what it is. May Iridium oxide or some heavy trans-uranium oxide. I do not > think thoria lasts very long at that temperature? Maybe it is a metal > hydrino compound <wlEmoticon-smile[1].png> > > Bob Cook > > From: Bob Higgins > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 8:03 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Vo]:BLP demo video > > Thank you, Axil, for this link. It is slide 49, in particular to which I am > making reference. In this slide you can see the soft x-ray set of lines > around 20-60nm, and another set of deep UV lines from 120-300nm. What I was > saying is that the band from 120-300nm is explain-able from the 10V source, > capable of providing 10eV direct excitation, while the lines from 20-60nm are > harder to explain. In fact, it is hard to measure this spectrum ... I wonder > what he used to measure it. > > <image.png> > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Dave, > > This may help > > http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/TechnicalPresentation1.8.16.pdf > > These are the slides used in the demo > > Slide 53 and/or 57 are what you might need to see what you want. >
