The Karabut experiment also undercuts the Mill's Hydrino conjecture. On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Ludwik Kowalski < [email protected]> wrote:
> Yes indeed. Experimental data reported by Karabut and his coworkers (from > Lutch laboratory in Russia) were spectacular, as summarized in: > > http://pages.csam.montclair.edu/~kowalski/cf/10lutch.html > > and in their later ICCF reports. Their apparatus was quite simple. > Unfortunately, I am not aware of independent confirmations of their results > in other laboratories. > > Ludwik > =========================== > > > On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:49 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: > > My take on the curves shown after slide 49 is that they were showing > evolution of the spectrum. As the machine and Ag vapor gets hotter and > hotter, the spectrum will begin to be dominated/overwhelmed by blackbody > radiation. What is heated to those temperatures is Ag vapor. I am not > sure exactly what you mean by "lasts very long at that temperature" (I > presume you mean doesn't melt), but I think the answer is that we are > talking about a vapor (gas) of Ag. Plasmas are commonly at that > temperature. > > I said that the 10V source has a capability of generating up to 10eV > effects which correspond to 124nm minimum wavelength photons. In the chart > 49 you can see the spectrum from the photons cut-off before reaching down > to 124nm. This spectrum is from the emissions of the silver+H2O in the arc > before being overwhelmed by the vapor around it that is very hot. A 10eV > electron or a 124nm photon is not enough to ionize the inner shells of Ag, > even if it is a vapor. Another thing to consider is drawing a > Stephan-Boltzmann curve over the UV portion of the radiation below that > cuts off just before reaching down to 124nm. The temperature for such a > curve would be about 6000K. Even at 6000K, you don't produce blackbody > photons at 124nm. My point here being that the soft x-ray spectra are not > explained by the temperature (even of 6000K) or 10eV possible excitations > from the 10V. > > OTOH, Karabut has published papers about the generation of laser-like > x-ray photons in systems capable only of lower energy transitions. It > could be a hydrino signature, but that was not Karabut's conclusion, nor > that of Peter Hagelstein who has a theory for what is happening in > Karabut's experiments. > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Bob-- >> >> Look at slides that follow #49—like about 57 and 60 or so. The first >> is a multi-colored spectrum of some different runs I believe in Nano meters >> up to about 500. And the second is a calculated spectrum for a black body >> for 5000 D Kelvin. Note that the multi-colored graph shows each run of the >> colored lines turning into a black body spectrum for about 5000 D K. >> >> If some material stands 5000 D K for any length of time, I would like to >> know what it is. May Iridium oxide or some heavy trans-uranium oxide. I >> do not think thoria lasts very long at that temperature? Maybe it is a >> metal hydrino compound <wlEmoticon-smile[1].png> >> >> Bob Cook >> >> *From:* Bob Higgins <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Friday, February 05, 2016 8:03 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:BLP demo video >> >> Thank you, Axil, for this link. It is slide 49, in particular to which I >> am making reference. In this slide you can see the soft x-ray set of lines >> around 20-60nm, and another set of deep UV lines from 120-300nm. What I >> was saying is that the band from 120-300nm is explain-able from the 10V >> source, capable of providing 10eV direct excitation, while the lines from >> 20-60nm are harder to explain. In fact, it is hard to measure this >> spectrum ... I wonder what he used to measure it. >> >> <image.png> >> >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear Dave, >>> >>> This may help >>> >>> >>> http://brilliantlightpower.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/TechnicalPresentation1.8.16.pdf >>> >>> These are the slides used in the demo >>> >>> Slide 53 and/or 57 are what you might need to see what you want. >>> >> > >
