Axil, Perhaps vacuum energy cannot perform measurable work at our typical physical macro velocities relative to C but vacuum wavelengths / virtual particle density does define inertial frames and ,IMHO, can do work if you are not outputting reaction mass to push an object toward C. My point is that if you harness DCE to move objects between different frames of negative portions of C where vacuum density is instead subtracted between different negative values by Casimir suppression you get these regions of equivalent negative accelerations for free as a property of the lattice defects and quantum geometry, and the normally un-exploitable property of HUP [random motion of gas] accumulates as it moves the atoms between these regions forcing a spatial imbalance where they start to contract in what I am convinced is actually a negative form of Lorentzian contraction and time dilation that fits the claimed anomalies for both f/h and tritium. Naudts should have pursued his 2005 math paper further but he did endorse the hydrino telling me he understood the implications but was afraid to go out on the limb. I continue to endorse a view that these negative vacuum regions can be as relativistic wrt open space as, open space is to the gravity well of an event horizon, but now the isotropy [vacuum density] is re-defined as the difference between the square law of gravitation and inverse cube of Casimir suppression. In this definition the hydrogen is able to exploit the previously un-exploitable property of random motion [HUP trap] to move between these negative frames whereas a positive equivalent would require rocket fuel to attain different frames in a gravity well. I believe there then exists a set stage for “building” a Heisenberg trap [Maxwellian demon of sorts] but nature will always take the path of least resistance and contracted hydrogen will forever move through these negative regions avoiding work unless we limit their paths and force its motion to perform work. I suspect the orbitals of f/h molecules oppose changes between inertial frames while atoms move freely and after disassociation the atoms reform new molecules at whatever inertial region they happen to occupy when they meet just waiting for random motion to move them away to regions where their contraction level opposes the local density enough to again disassociate the molecule and start the cycle over again. Photons from this process are very likely the key to engineering this process into a positive loop instead of nature’s desire to damp out and seek the easy path but SPP and resonance are beyond my skill set. Fran
From: Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 10:18 PM To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:DCE for SPP I don't believe that the vacuum does work. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Eric Walker <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:36 PM, <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I'm always a bit suspicious of theories that make use of "negative energy". It's what is needed to do negative work. Eric
