That is what I recall. Perhaps it is time to recheck this fact within his blog.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 12:50 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks Was it stated somewhere that the quark produces little or no heat? On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:34 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: I read his postings and remain quite skeptical. I especially find it difficult to believe that the output of one of these devices can be entirely electrical with no residual heat. Dave -----Original Message----- From: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 11:19 am Subject: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks Rossi has made several comments about a tiny version of the E-Cat X. He says he is thinking of using it as a basic module for larger units. How would he control it? Unless it is much more stable in the smaller size the cost of the control system would be a disadvantage. Interesting that it can be made that small though, There are many portable devices that could be powered by it. See E-CatWorld http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/02/29/rossi-small-e-cat-prototype-units-are-100-w-called-quarks/
