1. Lars March 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=67#comment-1155547>
Is your goal with E-Cat X to only produce electricity and with that being able to produce heat and light? 2. Andrea Rossi March 1, 2016 at 2:40 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=67#comment-1155576> Lars: No, she makes the three. Warm Regards, A.R. On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:18 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > I just read Rossi's answer to a question where he is asked if a quark can > be built that only puts out electricity with no heat. Frank Acland asked > the question and Rossi responded yes with his f9 key active. The answer > was fairly clear to me and extremely difficult to believe! I hope his > response was due to a missunderstanding of what was asked. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 1:35 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks > > What Rossi wants to do is produce the most basic LENR module that is > possible and do it as efficiently as possible using economies of scale. > It will be up to the systems integrator to design the backplane and heat > transfer system to meet the spec that is required. > A factory steam boiler, a railroad locomotive, a ship engine, a steel > blast furnace, a cement plant, or a jet engine will all use the Quark as > the basic module. How the Quark is put together it its thousands will be > the responsibility of the systems developer. > The Quark will be the lowest common denominator of all LENR based systems. > How it is configured to produce heat and/or light, and/or electricity are > defined by how it is configured. > For example, an existing 200 megawatt pebble bed reactor might be > configured by encasing a single Quark inside a carbon ball and placing that > ball inside an existing pebble bed reactor. It is up to the Chinese reactor > designer to test each ball for status and replace it when its operational > life is over as it goes through its daily inspection cycle. > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:20 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That is what I recall. Perhaps it is time to recheck this fact within >> his blog. >> >> Dave >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 12:50 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks >> >> Was it stated somewhere that the quark produces little or no heat? >> >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:34 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I read his postings and remain quite skeptical. I especially find it >>> difficult to believe that the output of one of these devices can be >>> entirely electrical with no residual heat. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: a.ashfield <[email protected]> >>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 11:19 am >>> Subject: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks >>> >>> Rossi has made several comments about a tiny version of the E-Cat X. He >>> says he is thinking of using it as a basic module for larger units. How >>> would he control it? Unless it is much more stable in the smaller size >>> the cost of the control system would be a disadvantage. >>> Interesting that it can be made that small though, There are many >>> portable devices that could be powered by it. >>> >>> See E-CatWorld >>> >>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/02/29/rossi-small-e-cat-prototype-units-are-100-w-called-quarks/ >>> >>> >> >
