1. Lars March 1, 2016 at 7:48 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=67#comment-1155651>
Can the Quark power itself? 2. Andrea Rossi March 1, 2016 at 9:18 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=67#comment-1155677> Lars: Partly. Warm Regards, A.R. Awhile back, Rossi said that an E Cat X would need two other feeder units to become self powering, On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:34 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > I see that he clarified his original statement somewhat. His original > post was quite misleading. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> > To: vortex-l <[email protected]> > Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 5:00 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks > > > 1. Lars > March 1, 2016 at 12:05 PM > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=67#comment-1155547> > Is your goal with E-Cat X to only produce electricity and with that > being able to produce heat and light? > 2. Andrea Rossi > March 1, 2016 at 2:40 PM > <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=67#comment-1155576> > Lars: > No, she makes the three. > Warm Regards, > A.R. > > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:18 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I just read Rossi's answer to a question where he is asked if a quark >> can be built that only puts out electricity with no heat. Frank Acland >> asked the question and Rossi responded yes with his f9 key active. The >> answer was fairly clear to me and extremely difficult to believe! I hope >> his response was due to a missunderstanding of what was asked. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> >> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >> Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 1:35 pm >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks >> >> What Rossi wants to do is produce the most basic LENR module that is >> possible and do it as efficiently as possible using economies of scale. >> It will be up to the systems integrator to design the backplane and heat >> transfer system to meet the spec that is required. >> A factory steam boiler, a railroad locomotive, a ship engine, a steel >> blast furnace, a cement plant, or a jet engine will all use the Quark as >> the basic module. How the Quark is put together it its thousands will be >> the responsibility of the systems developer. >> The Quark will be the lowest common denominator of all LENR based >> systems. How it is configured to produce heat and/or light, and/or >> electricity are defined by how it is configured. >> For example, an existing 200 megawatt pebble bed reactor might be >> configured by encasing a single Quark inside a carbon ball and placing that >> ball inside an existing pebble bed reactor. It is up to the Chinese reactor >> designer to test each ball for status and replace it when its operational >> life is over as it goes through its daily inspection cycle. >> >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:20 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> That is what I recall. Perhaps it is time to recheck this fact within >>> his blog. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Axil Axil <[email protected]> >>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 12:50 pm >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks >>> >>> Was it stated somewhere that the quark produces little or no heat? >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:34 PM, David Roberson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I read his postings and remain quite skeptical. I especially find it >>>> difficult to believe that the output of one of these devices can be >>>> entirely electrical with no residual heat. >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: a.ashfield <[email protected]> >>>> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Tue, Mar 1, 2016 11:19 am >>>> Subject: [Vo]:Rossi's tiny 100W quarks >>>> >>>> Rossi has made several comments about a tiny version of the E-Cat X. He >>>> says he is thinking of using it as a basic module for larger units. How >>>> would he control it? Unless it is much more stable in the smaller size >>>> the cost of the control system would be a disadvantage. >>>> Interesting that it can be made that small though, There are many >>>> portable devices that could be powered by it. >>>> >>>> See E-CatWorld >>>> >>>> http://www.e-catworld.com/2016/02/29/rossi-small-e-cat-prototype-units-are-100-w-called-quarks/ >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
