Bob Greenyer explains in this video that the lack of radiation in the Lugano test is probably due ~1mm or so tungsten envelope between the reactor core and the alumina tube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMs2We34jXo&feature=youtu.be He also describes some neat ideas for a ECat type reactor which could switch between heat, electricity and light producing modes. Harry On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 10:00 PM, H LV <[email protected]> wrote: > If the spectrum from the MFMP experiment really does come from the > reactor, and if MFMP reactor could run for 32 days > without lead shielding would one have to sit right next to it for the > entire time for it to be harmful? > > Harry > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: >> The sensors were placed relatively far away, and the total "dose" was low. >> For the electronic rate meters, they did not report what they detected, >> simply that it was below the alarm level that they had set (set where?). >> There was no spectrometry. >> >> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 4:12 PM, H LV <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> In the Lugano test dosimeters were used to check for gamma/xray >>> emissions at more than 50 cm from the reactor. (see Appendix 1) >>> http://amsacta.unibo.it/4084/1/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf >>> I don't understand all the jargon but over the 32 day duration test it >>> looks like the dosimeters didn't record anything above background. >>> If the MFMP reactor resembles the Lugano reactor why didn't the >>> dosimeters register any radiation? >>> >>> harry >>> >>
