If you listen to Shawyer speak (find his interview on Youtube) he goes overboard on stating how dangerous the microwave radiation is and how great care must be taken to avoid it. Clearly he has a lifetime of professional experience with this and thus surely has as perfectly as likely possible excluded the possibility of any escaping… It would require world class pathological skepticism to suggest this world class microwave expert did a poor job, bungled, and missed the escaping waves. The others replicating the EM drives also are clearly seen in their experiments to be more than sufficiently perfect in technique to make the closed systems needed to be safe and to demonstrate the effect. By the way very effective and inexpensive microwave detectors are available I have one that cost less than $10 that works like a charm seeing leaks of microwaves from my oven door seal… it can see leaks in one cm of the seal and not the next cm, that’s very clean signal detection/discrimination. So the tech needed to build and certify a perfectly sealed EM drive is dead simple!
From: Eric Walker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 9:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s) On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Russ George <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Given the apparent healthy condition of the experimentalists and the presence and proximity of the intense microwaves they are convincing living lab rat detectors. For the sake of argument, the EM radiation need not exit the device in the microwave spectrum. What is needed for the thought experiment is that its output be anisotropic. Are you recalling people's statements to the effect that no output has been measured, or are you inferring this from the fact that no one has been injured, on the assumption that any radiation would be microwave radiation? Eric
