Clearly many Vorts are attacking Rossi by using such words as ‘scam’ and trying 
to disparage the people Rossi has agreed to work with even though both Rossi 
and IH had to agree to such people’s competence. To disparage the competence of 
Penon based on old work and not the present well monitored work is to disparage 
the competence and/or the credibility of Rossi. In the environment where the 
word ‘scam’ and ‘scammer’ is so prominent attacks of this sort/vort on Penon 
are clearly meant to be insulting and slanderous to Rossi only it is done is 
such a cowardly way as to make the accusation clouded. 

 

From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 6:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Vo]:I.H. press release responding to Rossi

 

Russ George <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

 

What the free for all attack on Rossi by Vorts . . .

 

No one is attacking Rossi. We are reporting news of a lawsuit, and news that 
I.H. reports they think there is no excess heat. I described errors in the 
previous Penon paper. Those are all legitimate topics here. They are important. 
They are not attacks. No one has taken sides in the lawsuit, or even discussed 
it much, except to clarify a few points such as whether Rossi was already paid 
$10 million.

 

- Jed

 

Reply via email to