One has to read outside of the box to try to grasp what is going on. That IH 
entered into the agreement that had milestone payments and met two of those 
milestones seems indisputable… that they failed to honor the third milestone 
payment is also crystal clear. Given they were present during the 350 days out 
of 400 that were the final milestone and agreed to end at the 350 day mark is 
prima facie evidence of their cooperation to that point. Why is there a 
question at all here… IH agreed to end the demo early and then did not deliver 
on the final payment and Rossi has done precisely what he had to do to enforce 
his agreements and right. IH simply ‘blinked’ and did not honor the agreement.

 

From: Daniel Rocha [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 7:10 PM
To: John Milstone
Subject: Re: [Vo]:I.H. press release responding to Rossi

 

It is Rossi that says that the test was OK. According to IH, it was not OK, 
because IH says three years without success, not merely 1 year. So, the money 
is still in the escrow.

Reply via email to