*De-lurks* Ridiculous to assert that IH have not acting in good faith - if the demo worked they would be the happiest people in the world and would be on track to make vast amounts of money even if they had to hand over 90million they would be doing so with a big smile on their face. The very simple truth is that Rossi has made big claims and has (as usual) failed to deliver. Almost certainly IH will have their hands tied due to confidentiality agreements, so will be prevented from revealing in detail just how bad/unconvincing things are and how ridiculous Rossi's usual dissembling shenanigans have been.
Looking back through all his demos he has never done one that has unequivocally proven that it works - always potential errors greater than claimed outputs. I note also that attempted replications by those using high standards of practice like MFMP have not managed to get LENR unequivocally working - accepting that reality and yet believing that Rossi has through incredible luck and bad experimental practices succeeded with different configurations, different temperature regimes and different ignition methods and approaches with massive power outputs and high COPs where all others have failed is several bridges too far in the level of credulity required. I am no longer willing to give Rossi the benefit of the doubt - he is transparently just playing for time and more money, and with his track record you would need to be a mug or the king of wishful thinking to keep believing in him. The only vague question left in my mind is whether he truly believes he has cracked the LENR nut. I could be convinced that he does, and is fooling himself, but think it most likely he does not given how long his circus has been going on. On 8 April 2016 at 12:10, Frank Znidarsic <[email protected]> wrote: > It is Rossi that says that the test was OK. According to IH, it was not OK, > > because IH says three years without success, not merely 1 year. So, the > > money is still in the escrow. > > > Maybe we should ask Steven Krivit. He seems to have the heads up on a > lot of this stuff. >
