Ruby, clearly the history of the E-Cat is quite relevant and supports Rossi’s case that IH strongly believed in the tech. That IH has had the hardware in hand and has claimed to add inventions to the patent portfolio is evidence that they knew it works. The real reason behind the snarky negative and illogical comments about Rossi here and elsewhere quite simply speaks to the character of those making those comments. There are more than a few shills as well in the cold fusion world as well established over the decades. Groups like Vortex are a mystery as they often have some great ideas exchanged but in a heart-beat the snarling mud slingers go after anyone more successful than they are, and they set a very low bar to be measured against.
From: Ruby [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 9:27 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:I.H. press release responding to Rossi Why would the E-Cat unit sit for a year (back in 2012) with no where to go for testing when IH brought it for testing in the first place? (Remember everyone bashing Rossi for the delay after photos surfaced of the shipment?) Why would IH agree to such an "incompetent" tester? (Confidentiality agreements would have nothing to do with that.) Why would IH keep quiet about concerns for a full-year of testing - while applying for their own patent? Why would IH solicit and receive funds based on their "acquiring E-Cat IP"? After all of that, why does IH say now, the three years was "without results" - now that it is time to pay $89,000,000? To seriously claim "it is ridiculous to assert that IH have not acted in good faith" will require answers to these questions first. Ruby On 4/7/16 9:43 PM, Robert Lynn wrote: *De-lurks* Ridiculous to assert that IH have not acting in good faith - if the demo worked they would be the happiest people in the world and would be on track to make vast amounts of money even if they had to hand over 90million they would be doing so with a big smile on their face. The very simple truth is that Rossi has made big claims and has (as usual) failed to deliver. Almost certainly IH will have their hands tied due to confidentiality agreements, so will be prevented from revealing in detail just how bad/unconvincing things are and how ridiculous Rossi's usual dissembling shenanigans have been. I could be convinced that he does, and is fooling himself, but think it most likely he does not given how long his circus has been going on. On 8 April 2016 at 12:10, Frank Znidarsic <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: It is Rossi that says that the test was OK. According to IH, it was not OK, > because IH says three years without success, not merely 1 year. So, the > money is still in the escrow. Maybe we should ask Steven Krivit. He seems to have the heads up on a lot of this stuff. -- Ruby Carat Eureka, CA USA [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> www.coldfusionnow.org <http://www.coldfusionnow.org> lenrexplained.com
