A large blob of melted nickel that was pealed out of the Lugano reactor speaks louder than any thermocouple. The core of the Lugano reactor got beyond 1455C no matter what the external temperature reading showed or how those measurements were made.
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > If anyone is still operating under the illusion that there was valid > thermal > gain at Lugano, please re-educate yourself via the authoritative work of > Thomas Clarke. > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1c8DgA3A7ovRVhQcHBweTVNbjg/view?pref=2&pli > =1 > > The conclusion: The analysis here shows that the estimated excess heat in > the Report is wrong, and results from an incorrect assumption that alumina > is a gray body with temperature-dependent emissivity. In fact alumina has a > non-gray-body frequency-dependent spectral emissivity that combines with > Plank's Law to result in a temperature-dependent total emissivity. The > infra-red thermography results must thus be adjusted using the relevant > band > emissivity of alumina, not the temperature-dependent total emissivity. > > We show that when this error is corrected the resulting temperature is > 779C, > not the claimed 1401C. The total estimated power out from the system shows > a > COP of 1.07 and matches power in to within possible experimental error. > Remarkably, the two tests with 755W and 865W input have very similar COP, > and this similarity is not very sensitive to changes in parameters such as > alumina emissivity. Thus the argument for high differential COP used by the > Report as additional evidence falls and both the COP and differential COP > are as expected for a system with no excess heat. > > > From: Robert Dorr > > > I stand corrected. Rossi said, just today, that I.H built the E-Cat for > the Lugano test and that they even signed it. > > But the Lugano reactor did not produce significant excess heat, after the > measurement errors were accounted for, so the Lugano fiasco reaffirms the > stance of IH - that they have never witnessed excess heat in a valid test > of > a Rossi reactor. > > > > >
