At 01:30 am 14/01/2006 -0900, Horace wrote:

> How does the repulsion between two protons work 
> in your model, in and out of the lattice?
>
> Horace


That's a good question Horace cos it obviously relates
to the possibility of deuterons approaching deuterons
and fusing.

All I can do is to repeat what I have said clearly on
more than one occasion. The Beta-atmosphere pressure 
inside materials is many Alpha-atmospheres lower than
it is outside materials in allegedly empty space.

This means that the physics is going to be very different
inside than outside. Think Dr.Who's police box.

I am in the process of writing a post on The Horace Hiatus,
the gap between wavelength and  water.

On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:26:55 -0800 you displayed the 
curiosity of a true scientist when you wrote,

   ====================================================
   That's interesting.  I wonder how water does that.  
   The 320 GHz, 180 GHz, and 22 GHz is around .0936 cm,  
   0.1666 cm, and 1.363 cm wavelength respectively.  
   That is to say I wonder how that tiny molecule 
   collects those giant wavelengths?  It must be the 
   effect Bill Beaty talks about, where an antenna 
   sets up its own field that interferes with the big 
   incoming signal and collects energy from it. I never 
   did understand that effect.
   ====================================================

I only wish the professionals I had to deal with during
my four decades of government research had a fraction of 
the thirst for knowledge of the truth about nature that
you display.   8-)

In response to your observation, I commented,

   =================================================
   On the other hand it could be because it collects 
   energy, not from the transverse wave but from the 
   much shorter longitudinal wave.  
   =================================================

At the time I intuitively realised that was right - 
but I couldn'd see why. Now I can.  8-)

I've downloaded photos of the following relevant paper 
onto the Beta-atmosphere_group Yahoo site,

On the Nature of Mass, F.HOYLE & J.V.NARLIKAR
Nature Vol. 233, September 1971, pp.41-44

Anyone who wants to understand my deceptively simple
next post will be well advised to read that paper 
first. They may then avoid stepping straight into 
the merde on their way to the Vortex archives.   8-)

Cheers,

Frank Grimer


Reply via email to