a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: Jed. I do not know why. I wish they would. I do not want to ask them why, > because it is none of my business. I don't want to ask questions relating > to a lawsuit. I prefer to stick to technical questions. >
> That didn't stop you speculating that Penon was an idiot . . . I am not speculating. I know he is an idiot. I read his 2012 report. , the report was rubbish . . . If I.H. is correct, and there is no excess heat, then obviously the report is rubbish. According to Rossi's press release the report claims output is 80 times input. A mistake on that scale is inept. It is not unheard of, but it is inept. If Rossi is right, then I.H. is inept. One or the other must be drastically wrong. There is no middle ground. > & Rossi did not release it because it damned him. > Obviously if it is off by a factor of 80 it will damn him. You do not have to take my word for any of this. You can confirm or disprove everything I say with published sources from Rossi and I.H.: You can read Penon's 2012 report and decide for yourself whether he is an idiot. You can learn about the mistakes Rossi made at various times, especially with the NASA tests with the blocked flow. He has a track record of making drastic mistakes. That does not mean he is making one now, but it is is plausible. You can read the two press releases and decide for yourself which is more likely right, to the best of your own knowledge. I happen to have more knowledge of I.H.'s ability than you do, so I have the advantage here. - Jed
