Jed, Now he says it will be published after it is disclosed in court. Probably hoping that it won't be widely refuted before a decision is reached and reducing the number of experts who could be called by IH to refute the report. It can't think of any reason to do this beyond the fact that it would be damaging. Besides, once disclosed in court, it is part of the public record. He's not doing anybody favors by releasing it at that point. If he feels good about the report, I say release it and the raw data.
Andrea Rossi April 13, 2016 at 5:30 PM <http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=95#comment-1172432> Patrick Ellul: The Report will be published after it will have been disclosed in the Court. Everything you are reading now is just toilet paper, diffused by professionals of the same and the ones they have paid for. I can only repeat what my Attorney wrote in our press release, it is that we are pleased by the results. The results are coherent with what I have repeatedly written on this blog during the 352 days of test: the plant has worked mostly in SSM mode. As all the visitors have seen. Warm Regards, A.R. http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=892&cpage=95#comment-1172432 On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:17 PM Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jed. I do not know why. I wish they would. I do not want to ask them why, >> because it is none of my business. I don't want to ask questions relating >> to a lawsuit. I prefer to stick to technical questions. >> > > >> That didn't stop you speculating that Penon was an idiot . . . > > > I am not speculating. I know he is an idiot. I read his 2012 report. > > > , the report was rubbish . . . > > > If I.H. is correct, and there is no excess heat, then obviously the report > is rubbish. According to Rossi's press release the report claims output is > 80 times input. A mistake on that scale is inept. It is not unheard of, but > it is inept. > > If Rossi is right, then I.H. is inept. One or the other must be > drastically wrong. There is no middle ground. > > > >> & Rossi did not release it because it damned him. >> > > Obviously if it is off by a factor of 80 it will damn him. > > You do not have to take my word for any of this. You can confirm or > disprove everything I say with published sources from Rossi and I.H.: > > You can read Penon's 2012 report and decide for yourself whether he is an > idiot. > > You can learn about the mistakes Rossi made at various times, especially > with the NASA tests with the blocked flow. He has a track record of making > drastic mistakes. That does not mean he is making one now, but it is is > plausible. > > You can read the two press releases and decide for yourself which is more > likely right, to the best of your own knowledge. I happen to have more > knowledge of I.H.'s ability than you do, so I have the advantage here. > > - Jed > >
