Craig Haynie <[email protected]> wrote:
> IH had already paid Rossi $11.5 million, and Rossi had already given IH > his IP. > I.H. says the device does not work. Therefore the IP is worthless. If expert witnesses testify that I.H. is correct, and the judge rules in favor of I.H., I.H. will not have to pay the $89 million. In that case, the judge might also compel I.H. to sign away all rights to intellectual property. Since I.H. has concluded that the property has no value I do not think they would mind doing that. It would make no sense to say "it does not work" while also saying "we want to keep the intellectual property." As I said, judges apply common sense to situations like this. - Jed
