Yes, but is the “customer” he refers to  IH contracting to install more 
reactors or is this Rossi’s lawyer or other Rossi shell companies that want 
additional units at the Florida location for other purposes?  It just doesn’t 
make sense that Rossi would be selling anything to IH while pursuing a lawsuit 
for lack of payment – more likely it is for Leonardo Corporation or other 
licensee and incorporates some of the new technology.  Did Rossi indicate if 
these new reactors would be the same technology as original? I could see Rossi 
using the Fla location as a showroom for his technology and perhaps customers 
are needed to finance the new reactors but I remain skeptical that IH could be 
“the customer” while claiming the unit fails to meet agreed upon gain in 
litigation.
Fran
From: Sean True [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 11:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]: Rossi: 1MW Plant Customer Bought Three More Plants

There appear to be shell and holding companies. This is not unusual, nor is it 
unusual for a lawyer to act as a cutout. This keeps prying eyes (us) from 
observing the principals (people who want many watts of steam) closely.

Try penetrating a real estate trust, sometime.

Throwing additional dust into the air, it's also possible that more than one 
law firm is working for Rossi, but only one shows in the court filings. Less 
likely, but possible.

-- Sean

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Roarty, Francis X 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I thought the problem was the "customer" is also Rossi's lawyer?

-----Original Message-----
From: a.ashfield [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 10:51 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]: Rossi: 1MW Plant Customer Bought Three More Plants

So Rossi says the customer has ordered three more plants and he hopes to
build them in 180 days.

I expect the skeptics will write about "Rossi says" but I recall them
not believing the first plant existed because it was secret. Do they
accept the plant is real yet?   I don't know.

Anyway, if he has three orders in hand from the original customer, I
would say that is worth more than any expert's report when it gets to
court..

Reply via email to