What is amazing is that AR has time / energy & nerve to persuade business this way. By nerve I mean that in this situation when IH claims that he has not performed as per contract he says that others see his performance as good. If it works as AR says, then we will soon here from the real customer as I think it will be hard to keep secret who it is. Then AR will great support. OTH if he does not have anything and there is no order, why would he stick out his head? He would just lower his chances in court. I see no problem with that there is a lawyer as head of the 'customer' I think Sean has that right. I agree with you Francis that IH is not the customer at any time. It has to be a substantial entity if they can order three more and the result must be good.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros [email protected] +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > Yes, but is the “customer” he refers to IH contracting to install more > reactors or is this Rossi’s lawyer or other Rossi shell companies that want > additional units at the Florida location for other purposes? It just > doesn’t make sense that Rossi would be selling anything to IH while > pursuing a lawsuit for lack of payment – more likely it is for Leonardo > Corporation or other licensee and incorporates some of the new technology. > Did Rossi indicate if these new reactors would be the same technology as > original? I could see Rossi using the Fla location as a showroom for his > technology and perhaps customers are needed to finance the new reactors but > I remain skeptical that IH could be “the customer” while claiming the unit > fails to meet agreed upon gain in litigation. > > Fran > > *From:* Sean True [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2016 11:40 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]: Rossi: 1MW Plant Customer Bought Three > More Plants > > > > There appear to be shell and holding companies. This is not unusual, nor > is it unusual for a lawyer to act as a cutout. This keeps prying eyes (us) > from observing the principals (people who want many watts of steam) > closely. > > > > Try penetrating a real estate trust, sometime. > > > > Throwing additional dust into the air, it's also possible that more than > one law firm is working for Rossi, but only one shows in the court filings. > Less likely, but possible. > > > > -- Sean > > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Roarty, Francis X < > [email protected]> wrote: > > I thought the problem was the "customer" is also Rossi's lawyer? > > -----Original Message----- > From: a.ashfield [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 10:51 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]: Rossi: 1MW Plant Customer Bought Three More Plants > > So Rossi says the customer has ordered three more plants and he hopes to > build them in 180 days. > > I expect the skeptics will write about "Rossi says" but I recall them > not believing the first plant existed because it was secret. Do they > accept the plant is real yet? I don't know. > > Anyway, if he has three orders in hand from the original customer, I > would say that is worth more than any expert's report when it gets to > court.. > > >
