a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Yes, a woman did, during a public demonstration when one of the boxes was > sitting on a table. I have a video of it somewhere. This was an older > generation box but similar according to Rossi." > > What makes you think that was rated at 250 kW I think they were > different. Not only that, the insulation for the plant may have been > different. That was an older version of one of the 13 units which are now put together to form the 250 kW unit. See the drawing and lawsuit. > "Actually he told me that. Several people who have visited him confirmed > it." > > So you are saying someone else writes his emails not only on his blog but > to Cook with whom he is collaborating? > I am saying he does not use computers. He uses manual log books. That's what he told me, and others have told me. > I designed an all ectric glass melter that produces 1.5 t/day that is > about the size of your desk. > What is the unit "t"? > "All factory equipment of this nature must list such specifications by > law. You have to show electric power consumption,..." > > Not so. Said furnace had no name plate at all. > Commercial equipment all has name plates. Did you put this machine in a closed room, in a factory that no one is allowed into? Did it have 1 or 2 1-meter fans (at most) to cool it? If you put a 1 MW machine in an open bay like a truck being tested, or a kiln or blast furnace, then of course you can fit it into a small space. If you have intense ventilation such as in a ship engine room, you can put a 108,920 HP (81 MW) motor in an enclosed space with people working in close proximity. Like this: http://www.trucktrend.com/cool-trucks/1405-maersk-e-class-container-ships/#photo-04 - Jed
