thomas malloy wrote:
2. CO2 is the big target at the moment. When we switch to hydrogen-fired
cars, how long do you bet it will take before there is a big "green" push to
limit H2O vapor emissions?
This suggestion (made by someone else) is ridiculous. It is a comic
book caricature of environmentalism. Look around you when you will
see any number of severe environmental crises: erosion, air
pollution, overuse of paving, invasive species, litter and filth.
Everywhere you look in every country environmental degradation is
inescapable. Given all these challenges, why would anyone worry about
H2O vapor? We environmentalists are not fools, and we are not
irresponsible or otherworldly
Their next strategy will be to limit manmade thermo emissions. I
just heard that manmade gas emissions account for only two percent
of the total.
Where did you hear this? It seems unlikely, because in the first
world, fossil fuel energy generation produces twice as much carbon
dioxide as plant growth absorbs.
I suggest you stop spreading rumors about environmentalism, and try
to stick to critiquing actual statements made by real
environmentalists, rather than a strawman version.
- Jed
- Re: Gaia Scientist: DO PANIC Jed Rothwell
-
