Jed,If, as likely, the output of the E-Cats was not much above 100C, one would need some provision to ensure there wasn't excessive water carry over. Indeed without that the whole system might fill with liquid. Until shown otherwise I expect that was done. I also expect the steam to be wet in this circumstance and for accurate calorimetry some provision would have to be made to measure the wetness.
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,50... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. fac... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft.... Alan Fletcher
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft.... David Roberson
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq... Daniel Rocha
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. facility without... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. facility without... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. facility without... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. facility without... a.ashfield
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. facility wi... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. facilit... Alan Fletcher
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. fac... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft.... Lennart Thornros
- RE: [Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft.... Stephen Cooke