*dear Jed,* *i have just been writing my answer to this assertion:* *Announced a year ago this could be an argument but even then how could Rossi depart from the test plan; how many reactors were "inoperable" and in which sense? Flawed measurements have to be reported immediately and what unsuitable measuring instruments were used- for a long year for temperature, pressure, flow- seismometers, dynamometers, microscopes?*
*Now post-factum after 4 reports of the ERV, after alternative measurements by IH employees. such arguments are dead.* On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:21 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > >> IH has apparently sent Krivit a copy of their legal response to the court >> case. >> > I expect he found it by some other means. > > From a quick scan it doesn’t look like they have stated the E-Cat doesn’t >> work . . . >> > > It says this on p. 2, in the footnote: > > "Guaranteed Performance Test" that the Complaint purposely ignores (such > as departing from the purported test plan, ignoring inoperable reactors, > relying on flawed measurements, and using unsuitable measuring devices). > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
