Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: can you tell when had IH not accepted the instruments? (during the 1 year > test)? >
I heard about it early in the test. I do not recall when. The problems were obvious, so I.H. knew about them from the beginning. As I wrote here, several times, I was hoping Rossi would fix the problems, but he did not. > How long has Rosi and the ERV worked with instruments denied by IH and did > this not lead to a major conflict including stopping of the test? > I suppose I.H. could not stop the test. I guess it wasn't up to them. > Do you consider what you say here as plausible? > Not just plausible -- I know for a fact this is what happened. Rossi described the situation to Lewan the same way I heard about it. Rossi already told you that the test was a farce. He told you that he did not allow people into the customer site. That's all you need to know. There were many other idiotic aspect of it such as the choice of instruments, but that fact alone proves he is a fraud. I do not know why you believe a word he says. > You have never alluded to such problems in 2015 so this seems to be > history built backwards. > I know many things I never discuss. I never talk about other people's business. The only things I have said here were revealed by the press releases, the legal filing, and by Rossi himself in the interview with Lewan and elsewhere. > IF it will be proved that the 1MW plant has given excess heat your > reputation built during the Cold Fusion yeasrs will be damaged very deeply. > It will not be proved. That is out of the question. The calorimetry was preposterous. The error margins are gigantic. It is possible the machine produced a little heat at times, but 1 MW is impossible. - Jed
