Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: But the Dismiss document is Information too > These accusations also. Why has IH accepted unsuitable instruments? >
I.H. did not accept them! They objected strongly. They said there is no excess heat. They said Rossi used "flawed measurements" and "unsuitable measuring devices." Based on the sample of Rossi's calorimetry that I saw, anyone would say that. Anyone who walks into the room and sees the instruments would say, "what is this, a joke?" Heck, you do not even need to look at the instruments or data to see that this test was an outrageous farce. All you need to know is that Rossi refused to allow people into the customer site next door. Do you think there could be a legitimate reason for that? If you think that's okay, you would probably not see anything idiotic about the rest of the test. As Rossi said, the I.H. expert insisted he be allowed into the customer site. The expert agreed with me that this is outrageous. > Only the answer to this is genuine information? > I do not understand this sentence. The answer to what? I assume the information from Rossi is genuine. > I do not get the logic of this... > I do not know what you refer to. - Jed
