It is not that clear. Rossi maintains IH have not fulfilled the terms
of the agreement and his lawyer has issued a public statement saying
that IH's license has been withdrawn for said reason. So who owns what
will be income for lawyers for a long time I imagine. There maybe IP in
the new 250KW E-Cat's for example. Weren't IH complaining that he didn't
use the original E-Cats that were on standby?
On 6/4/2016 12:58 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
My point is a narrow one. Presumably with ownership of the plant, it is/was
within rights of IH to park it in a field in Nebraska, or to make a sculpture
out of the scrap metal, or to drop it off of a bridge in connection with a
television show. In this context, one wonders on what basis Rossi would have
thought that it made sense to place a lock on the door. IH have been very
patient with him.
Eric
On Jun 4, 2016, at 11:39, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
AA .What I have read was that IH were about to remove Rossi’s 1MW plant and
that was why Rossi locked his part of the building.
Eric. IH became the owner of the 1MW plant with the first payment of 1.5
million dollars.
AA. There is the small matter of whether Rossi gets paid $89 million depending
on the plant's performance. It maybe necessary to run it again to prove the
point with better instrumentation.
