a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> You keep on about IH's expertise: why did they agree to what was done? > They emphatically did not agree! That is what they said their press releases and motion to dismiss. > What he owed to IH was what an ERV provided. > Not according to the press releases or motion to dismiss. > It is too late after the show to start complaining. > They were complaining all along. Anyone would. The test was a farce. > Meanwhile I go with the independent ERV's report until proven otherwise. > Since you have no idea what the ERV's report says, how can you "go along" with it? - Jed
