a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jed. It is the only possible way to estimate the heat production. > > AA. Really? I could do it but your "experts" from IH couldn't? > No, you could not, except perhaps by ESP. Or -- what the heck -- you could just come up with some round numbers with 3 or 4 zeros, the way Rossi did. Rossi made sure no one could measure anything. As noted in I.H. motion to dismiss, the reactor was inoperable, the instruments flawed, and the measuring devices unsuitable. (Unsuitable is putting it mildly.) Since you know nothing about the particulars, you have no reason to claim that you could magically see through walls and measure the unmeasurable. Why do you think the I.H. expert "insisted" (Rossi's words) he must see the customer site? Do you think that was a whim? There was no reason? What grounds do you have to contradict this expert's judgement? You need to stop making stuff up. Pay attention to what Rossi actually said, and you will see that I right. - Jed
