Clearly, Rossi's reaction is LENR active. It has been replicated by many people.
This concern is...is the Rossi tech at a sufficiently advanced stage where it able to be commercialized? IH for whatever reason does not want to commercialise Rossi's tech. This does not mean that Rossi's reactor can't make money in the marketplace. The motive of IH is opaque. For some reason, they do not want to build a LENR production plant, either from uncomplicate of as an absurd business strategy. They do not want to abandon Rossi's IP. It could be that IH and Rossi are just incompatible in terms of management style. Rossi is a hard man to get along with. I think what IH has feed to Jed is a political SPIN stance to support their lawsuit defence. Being inherently a good and trusing person, trustful and loyal to his friends, JED will support them in their political moves. But Rossi's reactor will produce excess heat. It will hold steam. The question is...how efficient and reliable is the Rossi reactor at converting and controlling the excess heat into commercial levels of stream? On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 3:50 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > Eric. If he has something, let him show that he does through rigorous > testing. > > AA. Why the hell should he? He doesn't owe you anything and it is not in > his interest to do prove it to academia. I rather doubt that would be > possible anyway, as they think LENR is impossible. Think Clarke's Law. > Any evidence of anomalous heat is measurement error. > > Eric he seems to think that he is entitled to millions of dollars of > other people's money without doing the footwork necessary to merit that > kind of investment. > > AA. He has to do enough to persuade his backers and he has clearly done > that. He has avoided the fraudsters route of taking money from a gullible > public although he obviously had the ability to that if he had wanted to. > > Like Jed, you conclude he is guilty until proven innocent. > > > On 6/4/2016 3:22 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > > My conclusion is that Rossi's behavior has been abominable, and that he > shouldn't be given a free pass. If he has something, let him show that he > does through rigorous testing. He seems to want to take shortcuts and to > undermine any tests that are carried out, in private or in public. And he > seems to think that he is entitled to millions of dollars of other people's > money without doing the footwork necessary to merit that kind of > investment. On this latter question the courts will decide, thankfully. > > Rossi has no obligation to substantiate his public claims to us in the > audience. But neither do we have an obligation to apply anything other > than a scientific standard to what he has claimed. And in that court he > has repeatedly fallen short. > > Eric > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 2:14 PM, a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: > > We will see soon enough. I'm hoping that the QuarkX test will give >> positive results. If that happens it will alter the game. I gather that >> you are on Jed's side that the E-Cat doesn't work. I don't consider that >> proven. >> > > >
