So you don't have an answer to my question about why expert IH did not
insist on proper instrumentation at the start.
No. Complaining about it a year later, no matter how formally, does not
hack it.
On 6/4/2016 5:25 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I don't recall that. Care to give an actual quote they felt that
way at the BEGINNING?
The did not reveal that fact until the March 10 press release.
However, I and some other people were aware they were not happy with
the tests. As I said here several times, I was hoping Rossi would fix
the problems. Then on March 10 I learned there were still problems.
I do not know about the beginning. I heard several months into the
test. Assuming the configuration was the same at the beginning as it
was in Rossi's data, anyone would have found fault with it. I don't
know about this.
Press statements a year later don't hack it.
How about a motion to dismiss a lawsuit? That seems authoritative.
- Jed
