a.ashfield <[email protected]> wrote: Jed, > You are certain you know the answers. I don't claim I do and think there > are still many unknowns. >
For the last time: I am pretty sure I know the answers BECAUSE I HAVE THE DATA. You do not claim you know the answers BECAUSE YOU KNOW NOTHING. YOU HAVE NO DATA. You have no way to judge anything, and no way to judge how much is unknown, and how much is perfectly clear. You and I are not on equal ground. I am informed and you are ignorant. > I don't like ad hominem attacks you make on others such as Rossi and that > is the only reason I have replied to you. > I have attacked both the claims and Rossi, separately, so it is not ad hominem. That is defined as follows: "(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining." I am not directing the arguments against the person *rather than* the position. I am directing separate arguments *against both*. I attacked the person because he refused access to the company, and because the company is a dummy corporation with no income, no business, no employees, and no inspections, so obviously it does not have equipment using 1 MW of process heat. It is hard to imagine better proof of a fraud, or a better reason to attack someone! There is nothing unethical about attacking someone who has repeatedly committed illegal and immoral acts. On the other hand, you are mindlessly defending this person, and that is somewhat unethical. Frankly, it stinks. You should be ashamed of yourself. - Jed
