Dear Jed, Excuse me for joining the discussion, however the choices are simple something or nothing, excess heat or NOT excess heat- zero, nada, niente nihil etc. In the moment you accept that it was a small excess heat you are accepting implicitly that by adequate means it can be increased.. no compromise here. peter..
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: > > It is important, since one can select data to deceive you. There were >> times of malfunctioning that lasted a few days. >> > > This data was selected by Rossi. These are same numbers and conclusions he > quoted to Lewan. This dataset does not show what he considers a > malfunction. He considers it a positive result. His estimate of the heat is > listed. However, in my opinion, given the configuration and instruments, he > greatly exaggerated the heat, and there is no excess. (Or only a small > excess.) I agree with I.H. that the numbers do not show what he claims they > show. > > I am sorry to be so vague, but until Rossi or I.H. reveal more, I cannot > say more. > > > >> Also, Allan Fletcher and I showed that the device can work in a small >> place. >> > > I do not understand what this means. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
