Daniel Rocha <[email protected]> wrote: It is important, since one can select data to deceive you. There were times > of malfunctioning that lasted a few days. >
This data was selected by Rossi. These are same numbers and conclusions he quoted to Lewan. This dataset does not show what he considers a malfunction. He considers it a positive result. His estimate of the heat is listed. However, in my opinion, given the configuration and instruments, he greatly exaggerated the heat, and there is no excess. (Or only a small excess.) I agree with I.H. that the numbers do not show what he claims they show. I am sorry to be so vague, but until Rossi or I.H. reveal more, I cannot say more. > Also, Allan Fletcher and I showed that the device can work in a small > place. > I do not understand what this means. - Jed
